Oh poor you, all these people providing you with free tools. If it solves your problem, use it, if it doesn't don't.
If you don't want to take the time to figure out if it will actually be useful for you, wait for early adopters to kick the tires, write blog posts, etc. Then if it gains enough critical mass, and it seems to solve your problem much better than how you previously did things, use it.
Oh poor you, all these people providing you with free tools. If it solves your problem, use it, if it doesn't don't.
Do you really believe that the motive behind this charity is 100% altruistic?
Oh man, I gotta an ocean front house in Arizona to sell ya!
Joking aside, these people publishing and releasing these frameworks to the public at min looking for reciprocal treatment in terms of improvements to their product made by the community and the general adoption of it by wide segments of the community making it easier for them to recruit and integrate new team members with minimal costs in training and sunken costs.
So, this symbiotic relationship between us devs and these corporations is neither altruistic nor patrimonialistic
Yeah, no, you don't make a project open-source and expect people to improve it as much as you will. It just doesn't work like this.
An open-source project is a burden, you probably won't gain anything from them, and will probably lose a lot of time. Almost all of my projects are OS, but I don't do it expecting people to come over and help (even if it is sure nice when they do).
If you don't want to take the time to figure out if it will actually be useful for you, wait for early adopters to kick the tires, write blog posts, etc. Then if it gains enough critical mass, and it seems to solve your problem much better than how you previously did things, use it.