this is.. not how contracts work at all. contracts in bad-faith or that impose unreasonable stipulations are not exactly binding regardless of a signature.
the question of course becomes whether or not it is worth it to litigate but that is another conversation.
I described the ideal. Ideally, you wouldn’t be able to sign a contract whose contents were made transparent to you, then sue so that only the part of the contract benefitting you is upheld. Yet here we are.
the question of course becomes whether or not it is worth it to litigate but that is another conversation.