"You can't place a restraining order because that's not in the DMCA!"
--
"The takedown wasn't a DMCA related takedown."
Am I missing something here? Are courts really so blind to the major label's bullying games that this wasn't IMMEDIATELY approved and an injunction placed until further proceedings?
I mean, no I'm not a lawyer but I have studied contract law and these just seems moronic.
Yup don't get it at all. Unfortunately, the thing that would probably happen is their first point would get ignored and the second point would be investigated. (Even though it does throw a subjective shadow over the whole thing...)
--
"The takedown wasn't a DMCA related takedown."
Am I missing something here? Are courts really so blind to the major label's bullying games that this wasn't IMMEDIATELY approved and an injunction placed until further proceedings?
I mean, no I'm not a lawyer but I have studied contract law and these just seems moronic.