While it’s definitely an incremental step forward, it doesn’t seem drastically better than the Confluence wiki I’ve used in prior companies. Are there killer features I’m missing beyond database row views?
Also, is Kopa.co an active company or still in prototype phase? All I see when I browse the city lists are 404s and no listings[1]. I mean no disrespect and don’t have all the details, but it seems counterproductive to spend so much time on business organization before the product.
It’s night and day compared to confluence for me. I think the biggest value prop is that the editing experience is actually fun which makes people want to use it. Compared to every single Confluence wiki I’ve watched languish supported only by that one guy who snorts it to feel alive.
i have a theory the problems with confluence are (no longer) related to confluence itself but the data organization. too many people. too many reorgs. not enough incentive to update. once they added real-time collaborative editing it changed the game. i think notion/clickup will be considered just as difficult to organize and make sense of once they gain enough adoption
I could see that, our users loved Confluence because it was such an improvement over Gdocs or a shared network drive. Once the wysiwig editor came out our departments organically began to use it for everything. That was years ago though, user expectations continually rise so I can see your point.
Also, is Kopa.co an active company or still in prototype phase? All I see when I browse the city lists are 404s and no listings[1]. I mean no disrespect and don’t have all the details, but it seems counterproductive to spend so much time on business organization before the product.
1. https://www.kopa.co/c/california/san-francisco