Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Given two options, both unknown on how they would impact the problem (and near impossible to test even if we did implement a change because we cannot isolate other variables), I would default to the one that increases freedom and decreases imprisoning others.

Also, indirect prohibition has shown to be failure time and time again, often being more harmful than not.



I'm not here to talk about drugs. How does this connect back to ivory and whether or not we should produce large quantities of fake ivory?


That last post was all about ivory, not about drugs. That it can be so easily confused shows the connection between the two.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: